Tuesday, 05 May 2026
Breaking News
DRUG TRAFFICKER SUPPLYING CHARAS FROM HIMACHAL APPREHENDED IN PINJORE KAMAL SISODIYA CELEBRATES HER BIRTHDAY WITH DIFFERENTLY-ABLED AND UNDERPRIVILEGED SECTIONS PGIMER CELEBRATES SECOND ANNUAL ‘SARATHI DAY’, HONOURS SPIRIT OF VOLUNTARY SERVICE AND TRANSFORMATIVE PATIENT CARE JOURNALISTS EXHORTED TO BE "CARRIERS OF LIGHT, NOT JUST NEWS  LUDHIANA BECOMES THIRD CITY IN PUNJAB TO ADOPT INTELLIGENT TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM  WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE SOCIETY INAUGURATES NEW SESSION WITH FRESH BATCH POWER SUPPLY WILL REMAIN OFF FROM 11 AM TO 3 PM DUE TO ERRECTION OF NEW 11 KV FEEDER RAIN HITS WHEAT STOCKS IN MANDIS, COMMISSION AGENTS BLAME DELAYED LIFTING DEFENDING CHAMPIONS MINERVA ACADEMY BREAK JAMSHEDPUR RESISTANCE IN ADDED TIME POWER MINISTER SANJEEV ARORA REVIEW RESTORATION EFFORTS AFTER STORM DAMAGE; APPLAUDS PSPCL FOR GREAT EFFORTS
Chandigarh Trending

CCI ISSUES DESIST ORDER AGAINST CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD FOR INDULGING IN ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES

Read in:English

(MOREPIC1)  Face2News/Chandigarh/New Delhi

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) issued an order under Section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“Act”) on Wednesday holding Chandigarh Housing Board (CHB) to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 4(2)(a)(i) read with Section 4(1) of the Act.

The case was initiated on the basis of an Information filed by Mr. Ramesh Kumar, an allotee of a flat offered under a Self-Financing Housing Scheme (“Scheme”) floated by CHB in the year 2010.

It was alleged that CHB has abused its dominant position under Section 4 of the Act, inter alia, by imposing unfair terms and clauses on the allottees, failure on behalf of CHB to disclose the date of possession of the flats to the allotees in its Brochure and/or Acceptance- Cum- Demand Letter (ACDL), and levy of penal interest for full month even for delay of one day.

Having delineated the relevant market as the “market for the provision of services for development and sale of residential flats in the Union Territory of Chandigarh”, the Commission found CHB to be in a dominant position so as to operate independently of the competitive forces prevailing in the relevant market. The Commission also found non- disclosure of date of delivery of possession to applicants of the flats and levying penal interest for full month on account of delay of one day in credit of instalment to be an abuse of dominant position under section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Act.

Considering the fact that corrective measures have already been taken by CHB, the CCI refrained from imposing any monetary penalty upon CHB.

15,598 articles
View all articles