Saturday, 22 August 2026
Breaking News
6TH PANCHKULA DISTRICT SHASTRANG CHAMPIONSHIP BEGINS WITH GREAT ENTHUSIASM DRUG ADDICTION IN PUNJAB HAS QUADRUPLED UNDER AAP: CONGRESS DRUG NETWORKS OPERATED FROM NABHA, GURDASPUR JAILS UNEARTHED; 6.465 KG HEROIN, TWO PISTOLS RECOVERED UK MP TANMANJEET SINGH DHESI MEETS PUNJAB NRI AFFAIRS MINISTER RAVJOT SINGH, MAYANK FOUNDATION HONOURED FOR PROMOTING VOLUNTARY BLOOD DONATION FROM BJP OFFICE COMPUTER OPERATOR TO HARYANA CHIEF MINISTER- NAYAB SINGH SAINI TELLS HIS STORY HARYANA TO FAST-TRACK 8 MCH WINGS, CONVERT SNCUS INTO MNCUS BY NOVEMBER 1; MAJOR PUSH FOR MOTHER-NEWBORN CARE WEIGHTLIFTING TOURNAMENT FOR BOYS AND GIRLS (YOUTH AND JUNIOR) CONCLUDES SUCCESSFULLY DELHI POLICE NABS TWO GANGSTERS OF HIMANSHU BHAU AFTER BRIEF EXCHANGE OF FIRE GURU RAVIDAS JI’S 650TH PRAKASH PURAB: DRONE SHOWS TO BE HELD IN ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES ACROSS MALWA, DOABA AND MAJHA FROM SEPTEMBER 1
Chandigarh Trending

CCI ISSUES DESIST ORDER AGAINST CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD FOR INDULGING IN ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES

Read in:English

(MOREPIC1)  Face2News/Chandigarh/New Delhi

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) issued an order under Section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“Act”) on Wednesday holding Chandigarh Housing Board (CHB) to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 4(2)(a)(i) read with Section 4(1) of the Act.

The case was initiated on the basis of an Information filed by Mr. Ramesh Kumar, an allotee of a flat offered under a Self-Financing Housing Scheme (“Scheme”) floated by CHB in the year 2010.

It was alleged that CHB has abused its dominant position under Section 4 of the Act, inter alia, by imposing unfair terms and clauses on the allottees, failure on behalf of CHB to disclose the date of possession of the flats to the allotees in its Brochure and/or Acceptance- Cum- Demand Letter (ACDL), and levy of penal interest for full month even for delay of one day.

Having delineated the relevant market as the “market for the provision of services for development and sale of residential flats in the Union Territory of Chandigarh”, the Commission found CHB to be in a dominant position so as to operate independently of the competitive forces prevailing in the relevant market. The Commission also found non- disclosure of date of delivery of possession to applicants of the flats and levying penal interest for full month on account of delay of one day in credit of instalment to be an abuse of dominant position under section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Act.

Considering the fact that corrective measures have already been taken by CHB, the CCI refrained from imposing any monetary penalty upon CHB.

15,596 articles
View all articles