Tuesday, 29 September 2026
Breaking News
JAAGAT JOT SATKAR ACT WILL ASSUAGE SENTIMENTS OF SIKH COMMUNITY: BABA LAKHA SINGH NEXUS ELANTE AND ACCESS LIFE JOIN HANDS TO RAISE CHILDHOOD CANCER AWARENESS ACCUSED FROM ABOHAR SENTENCED TO 20 YEARS OF RI FOR ABDUCTING AND RAPING SCHOOL-GIRL PANIC GRIPS SUB DIVISIONAL COMPLEX AS TWO GROUPS CLASH GLUE TRAP CLAIMS ANOTHER INNOCENT VICTIM: DUSKY CRAG MARTIN GOT RESCUED INCLUDE THE HISTORY OF ASAFWALA MARTYRS IN SCHOOL CURRICULUM : PRESIDENT MURMU WITH 100 ENTRIES IN THE FIRST ATTEMPT, AIFF SCRIPTS HISTORY HARYANA CABINET MINISTER RAO NARBIR SINGH INAUGURATES THE 7TH RAMA ATRAY WOMEN'S TWENTY-20 CRICKET TOURNAMENT GNDU CONFERS ‘PUNJAB HINDI SAHITYA RATAN’ HONOUR ON MANOJ DHIMAN ‘GRIT & GLORY’ RELEASED IN GUWAHATI, HOMAGE PAID TO RSS MARTYRS
Sports Trending

IWF ELECTIONS: CAS UPHOLDS APPEALS FILED BY RUSSIAN WEIGHTLIFING FEDERATIONS AND OTHERS

Read in:English

LAUSANNE: The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has upheld the appeals filed by the Russian Weightlifting Federation (RWF), Maxim Agapitov, Dmitry Chernogorov and Aleksandr Kishkin (the Appellants) against the four decisions rendered on 23 May 2022 by the Eligibility Determination Panel (EDP) of the International Weightlifting Federation (IWF) (the Challenged Decisions) by which the RWF was “prohibited from nominating any candidate for election to the Executive Board, any IWF Commission and any IWF Committee for the IWF elections to be held in June 2022” and, as a consequence, the three candidates Agapitov, Chernogorov and Kishkin were declared ineligible for the same elections.

The Challenged Decisions have been set aside.The CAS Panel in charge of the matters found that the IWF EDP did not have jurisdiction to prevent the RWF from nominating candidates for the elections. Indeed, such decision is of a disciplinary nature and, as provided by Article 13 of the IWF Constitution, it was not for the IWF EDP to rule on the suspension of the RWF in the light of Article 13.12 of the IWF Constitution, but only to determine the eligibility of the candidates in accordance with the IWF Constitution.

Therefore, the CAS Panel could only set aside the Challenged Decisions and state that the ground justifying the ineligibility of the three candidates Agapitov, Chernogorov and Kishkin, proposed by the RWF for election, no longer existed.

15,596 articles
View all articles