Tuesday, 18 August 2026
Breaking News
TEEJ FESTIVAL CELEBRATED WITH GREAT ENTHUSIASM AT GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE KHUNIMAJRA BSKC STUDENT AMANPREET KAUR HONORED IN 'HAR GHAR TIRANGA' NATIONAL PAINTING COMPETITION IAS KANWAL PREET BRAR APPEARED BEFORE ED AT JALANDHAR IN CLU CASE DC CHAIRS 26TH DISTRICT ROAD SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING; DIRECTS TIME-BOUND ACTION ON ROAD SAFETY MEASURES FIVE DAYS PHOTO EXHIBITION 'DRISHTI-2026' BY TRICITY PHOTO ART SOCIETY ON WORLD PHOTOGRAPHY DAY FROM AUGUST LOVE LIPSTICK? NYKAA HAS A BUILT A WALK-IN WARDROBE IN LUDHIANA JUST FOR YOU THIS WEEK ABHISHEK SAYS, “IT LOOKS LIKE A SHAH RUKH KHAN AND KAJOL PAIRING,” AS VIEWERS COMPARE HIS CHEMISTRY WITH JANNAT TO THE ICONIC PAIRING OF BHARTI AND HAARSH FROM THE INDIAN GAME SHOW WESTERN HIMALAYA HEATING FASTER THAN THE EAST; STANDS TO LOSE MOST SNOW IN COMING YEARS: STUDY SADQI RETREAT CEREMONY TIME CHANGED MASON HARPAL SINGH WINS RS 15 LAKH LOTTERY PRIZE
Himachal Trending

HIGH COURT UPHELD REMOVAL OF A CONDUCTOR FROM SERVICE

Read in:English

(MOREPIC1) Shimla (Vijyender Sharma)

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh, today upheld the removal of a conductor from service by Himachal Road Transport Corporation (HRTC). Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, dismissed the petition filed by one Ramesh Kumar against his removal from the service by HRTC.

The petitioner was initially engaged as a Conductor on daily wage basis in HRTC on 14.07.1983 and later his services were regularized on 10.03.1984. On 29.07.1991, the petitioner was charges-sheeted by the respondents-Corporation for misappropriation of a sum of Rs. 10,998/-

The inquiry was conducted and on completion thereof, the respondents-Corporation ordered the removal of the petitioner from service w.e.f. 23.06.1994.

The Court observed that there is absolutely no scope for any conductor to misappropriate the revenues of the Corporation. It is not that a watch-dog or a checking official accompanies every conductor at all times and all places during his service. It is not the quantum of money, which could constitute the gravamen of the charge of misappropriation against the bus conductor. What is relevant is the frame of mind of the conductor leading to a wrongful loss to the Corporation and wrongful gain for himself, which itself is sufficient to record a finding of guilt against the bus conductor in a State owned Transport Corporation.

The Court found no merit in the petition filed by the petitioner against his removal from service by the Himachal Road Transport Corporation (HRTC) and dismissed the same.

15,596 articles
View all articles