Sunday, 26 July 2026
Breaking News
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT TO HEAR CASE OF THREE INDIAN OFFICERS FROM MT GLOBAL CHERYLYN ON JULY 27 GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB SUMMONS 13TH SESSION OF 16TH PUNJAB LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY NURSING-NOT MERELY A PROFESSION BUT ONE OF THE NOBLEST FORMS OF SERVICE TO THE DIVINE ‘NEASDEN TEMPLE’ AGAIN HONOURED WITH TRIPADVISOR TRAVELLERS’ CHOICE AWARD ASSAM FLOOD SITUATION REMAINS GRIM, OVER 60 DIE, LAKHS AFFECTED CDTI, IN COLLABORATION WITH CSCA CHAPTER MOONLIGHT, RAISES CYBER SECURITY AWARENESS AMONG SENIOR CITIZENS INVESTMENT FRIENDLINESS INDEX 2026: HIMACHAL 3RD AMONG HILLY & NORTH-EASTERN STATES 3 MISCREANTS WHO LOOTED THE PASSERS-BY ARRESTED WITHIN 24 HOURS YOGA ABHYAS SANSTHAN CELEBRATES ITS THIRD FOUNDATION DAY WITH GREAT ENTHUSIASM IN MOHALI GOVT COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ORGANISED THREE-DAY WORKSHOP ON “THE INCLUSIVE CLASSROOM: BRIDGING GAPS WITH AUDIO-VISUAL STRATEGIES
Punjab Trending

VIGILANCE BUREAU ARRESTS ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER FOR TAKING BRIBE RS 15 LAKH

Read in:English

ACCUSED ASE DEMANDING RS 20 LAKH MORE TO FAVOUR COMPLAINANT 

(MOREPIC1) Face2News/Jalandhar/Chandigarh

The Punjab Vigilance Bureau (VB) during its anti-corruption campaign on Thursday, arrested an Additional Superintendent Engineer (ASE), Sukhwinder Singh Multani, posted at Jalandhar for taking a bribe of Rs 15 lakh and demanding more money of Rs 20 lakh. 

Disclosing this here today, a spokesperson of the VB said this case has been registered against the above said PSPCL officer, who was earlier posted as Executive Engineer (Xen) Technical Audit, PSPCL Jalandhar on the complainant of Sharanjeet Singh, store keeper, PSPCL Verka, in Amritsar. In this regard the complainant has lodged an online plaint along with evidence in audio-video format at the Chief Minister's anti-corruption action line. (SUBHEAD)

Giving details, he added that the complainant has alleged that the above said officer had already taken Rs 15 lakh as a bribe, when he was Xen, to send an inspection report of store inventory in his favour and now demanding Rs 20 lakh more to recommend his reinstatement on the job as the complainant was suspended on the basis of stock verification report.

The complainant has recoded the entire conversation as an evidence which has been submitted to the VB to probe into the gratification matter.