Tuesday, 18 August 2026
Breaking News
TEEJ FESTIVAL CELEBRATED WITH GREAT ENTHUSIASM AT GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE KHUNIMAJRA BSKC STUDENT AMANPREET KAUR HONORED IN 'HAR GHAR TIRANGA' NATIONAL PAINTING COMPETITION IAS KANWAL PREET BRAR APPEARED BEFORE ED AT JALANDHAR IN CLU CASE DC CHAIRS 26TH DISTRICT ROAD SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING; DIRECTS TIME-BOUND ACTION ON ROAD SAFETY MEASURES FIVE DAYS PHOTO EXHIBITION 'DRISHTI-2026' BY TRICITY PHOTO ART SOCIETY ON WORLD PHOTOGRAPHY DAY FROM AUGUST LOVE LIPSTICK? NYKAA HAS A BUILT A WALK-IN WARDROBE IN LUDHIANA JUST FOR YOU THIS WEEK ABHISHEK SAYS, “IT LOOKS LIKE A SHAH RUKH KHAN AND KAJOL PAIRING,” AS VIEWERS COMPARE HIS CHEMISTRY WITH JANNAT TO THE ICONIC PAIRING OF BHARTI AND HAARSH FROM THE INDIAN GAME SHOW WESTERN HIMALAYA HEATING FASTER THAN THE EAST; STANDS TO LOSE MOST SNOW IN COMING YEARS: STUDY SADQI RETREAT CEREMONY TIME CHANGED MASON HARPAL SINGH WINS RS 15 LAKH LOTTERY PRIZE
Himachal Trending

DENIAL OF NOC HIGHLY UNJUST AND ARBITRARY : HP HIGH COURT

Read in:English

(MOREPIC1) Vijyender Sharma/Shimla

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh has found the denial of NOC and not allowing Extra Ordinary Leave to a Senior Resident Doctor to participate in the NEET Super Specialty Course counseling, by the Director Health Services, Govt. of H.P., highly unjust and arbitrary.

Justice Ranjan Sharma, passed this order on a petition filed by Dr. Anupam Sharma.

The petitioner is serving as Senior Resident (General Surgery), in the Dr. Y.S. Parmar Government Medical College, Nahan. He appeared for the NEET Super Specialty Examination 2023, conducted by the National Medical Commission and qualified the aforesaid examination.

(SUBHEAD)After qualifying the Examination the petitioner applied to the Director of Health Services for issuance of NOC and Grant of Extra Ordinary Leave, so as to enable him to pursue higher studies of NEET Super Specialty Course. The respondents neither acceded to the request of the petitioner nor conveyed a decision in this regard. The petitioner was informed verbally on 6.11.2023, that NOC cannot be issued. The petitioner was left with no other option but to approach the High Court.

The Court found that the action of the respondent in sleeping over the matter and in neither considering nor conveying any decision thereon amounts to depriving petitioner of his rights. The Court observed that the fairness demanded that the respondents should have considered the case and pass an appropriate order. The Court further observed that the action of the State authorities is not only deplorable but at the same time it has lead to arbitrariness and perversity.

The Advocate General appearing for the respondents contended that as per provisions of policies framed in this regard, no NOC is to be granted but after going through the policies, the Court found that the NOC cannot be granted for second post graduation course which is not the claim of the petitioner. The Court directed the respondents to issue NOC in favour of the petitioner forthwith and also hand over the original certificates of the petitioner, so as to enable him to participate in the Counseling.

15,596 articles
View all articles