Tuesday, 07 July 2026
Breaking News
HIGH COURT ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ADMINISTERED OATH TO TWO PERMANENT JUDGES DAV COLLEGE CHANDIGARH TERMINATES ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AFTER 13 YEARS FOR APPOINTMENT BASED ON FAKE CMJ UNIVERSITY PH.D. DEGREE THREE LINKED TO TWO NARCOTICS SMUGGLING NETWORKS HELD WITH 13KG HEROIN IN AMRITSAR  SRI ANANDPUR SAHIB RESIDENT ISSUED NOTICE FOR RELEASING “FAKE VIDEO” OF TEENAGE VICTIM CM INAUGURATES DAILY HELICOPTER SERVICES LINKING KULLU, MANDI AND CHANDIGARH ADVOCATE SEEKS CLARIFICATION REGARDING OFFICIAL RECOGNITION OF POST OF DEPUTY SECRETARY IN HPSC MISSING MINOR GIRL NOT RECOVERED IN 45 DAYS, PEOPLE ASK WHICH SECURITY OF WOMEN THE GOVT CLAIMED PLAY "CHAR TANGE" DELIVERS A SHARP CRITIQUE OF SOCIAL EVILS IN SEARCH OF LOVE, I BECAME LOVE” BY MADHU PANDIT LAUNCHED AT MGSIPA CRIME HAS NO GENDER, SO THE JUSTICE SHOULD HAVE NO GENDER"
Himachal Trending

DENIAL OF NOC HIGHLY UNJUST AND ARBITRARY : HP HIGH COURT

Read in:English

(MOREPIC1) Vijyender Sharma/Shimla

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh has found the denial of NOC and not allowing Extra Ordinary Leave to a Senior Resident Doctor to participate in the NEET Super Specialty Course counseling, by the Director Health Services, Govt. of H.P., highly unjust and arbitrary.

Justice Ranjan Sharma, passed this order on a petition filed by Dr. Anupam Sharma.

The petitioner is serving as Senior Resident (General Surgery), in the Dr. Y.S. Parmar Government Medical College, Nahan. He appeared for the NEET Super Specialty Examination 2023, conducted by the National Medical Commission and qualified the aforesaid examination.

(SUBHEAD)After qualifying the Examination the petitioner applied to the Director of Health Services for issuance of NOC and Grant of Extra Ordinary Leave, so as to enable him to pursue higher studies of NEET Super Specialty Course. The respondents neither acceded to the request of the petitioner nor conveyed a decision in this regard. The petitioner was informed verbally on 6.11.2023, that NOC cannot be issued. The petitioner was left with no other option but to approach the High Court.

The Court found that the action of the respondent in sleeping over the matter and in neither considering nor conveying any decision thereon amounts to depriving petitioner of his rights. The Court observed that the fairness demanded that the respondents should have considered the case and pass an appropriate order. The Court further observed that the action of the State authorities is not only deplorable but at the same time it has lead to arbitrariness and perversity.

The Advocate General appearing for the respondents contended that as per provisions of policies framed in this regard, no NOC is to be granted but after going through the policies, the Court found that the NOC cannot be granted for second post graduation course which is not the claim of the petitioner. The Court directed the respondents to issue NOC in favour of the petitioner forthwith and also hand over the original certificates of the petitioner, so as to enable him to participate in the Counseling.

15,597 articles
View all articles